History 216-01: "From the American Revolution through the American Civil War"

 J.P. Whittenburg

Email: jpwhit@wm.edu
Office: Young House (205 Griffin Avenue)
Web Page: http://jpwhit.people.wm.edu
Telephone: 757-221-7654
Office Hours: By Appointment


Clearly, this isn't your typical class. For one thing, we meet all day on Fridays. For another, we will spend most of our class time "on-site" at museums, battlefields, or inside historic buildings. This class will concentrate on the period from the end of the American Revolution through the end of the American Civil War), but it is not at all a narrative that follows a neat timeline. I’ll make no attempt to touch on every important theme and we’ll depart from the chronological approach whenever targets of opportunities present themselves. I'll begin most classes with some sort of short background session--could be a clip from a movie, could be oral reports, or maybe something from the Internet. As soon as possible, though, we'll be into a van and on the road. Now, travel time can be tricky and I do hate to rush students when we are on-site. I'll shoot for getting people back in time for a reasonably early dinner--say 5:00. BUT there will surely be times when we'll get back later than that. There will also be one OPTIONAL overnight trip--to Gettysburg Battlefield. If these admitted eccentricities are deeply troubling, I'd recommend dropping the course. No harm, no foul—and no hard feelings.

I've always held discussions in this class over an extended lunch hour. In my opinion, the food has added considerably to the fun of the course, and I'd like to retain the feature. We'll picnic some of the time. (Pizza or sandwiches) On those days, I will take orders for food by email and you can reimburse me. When we eat at a sit-down restaurant, I'll usually put the entire bill on a credit card and, again, you can reimburse me. Whenever possible, I'll post a link to a menu on the class web site several days before the trip. Costs beyond the food might include computer supplies, photographic supplies/services (optional), and maybe some printing and photocopying. This is all "heap cheap," especially in view of....

Readings: Everything is available FREE on-line! All of the readings we'll use are available from Blackboard under this course--History 216-03. Just go to "COURSE DOCUMENTS." The readings include both essays from the country's leading professional journals and chapters from key monographs. You may read these essays and book chapters on-line or print them out first. No need to bring them to class. Typically, there will be two or three essays or chapters to mull over for each Friday. Our Blackboard site also includes a digital copy of the writing guide for this course: Mary Lynn Rampolla, A Pocket Guide to Writing in History (2006). If you would like to purchase a paper copy, I'd suggest doing it on-line. The ISBN is 1031244673X, but any edition is fine. You'll need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the readings for this class. If you need to install it, you can download it here:

Requirements & Grades: Students generally want to know every little thing about the grading system, but truth be known, it is all pretty-much a subjective process and in the end I will evaluate the totality of your work over the course of the semester. Admittedly, many students find this ambiguity unsettling during the semester, but few seem to think the grades unfair in the end. Keep in mind that A grades are reserved for EXCEPTIONAL work, and to win an A for the course means hitting on just about all cylinders just about all of the time. The grade of B covers a much wider range of perfectly acceptable, even superior, performance. Any student who scrambles over all the course requirements and delivers even a modest effort should have no trouble attaining a C--acceptable, but undistinguished. To receive a final grade lower than C, a student in this class would simply have to stop trying. I do use pluses and minuses, by the way. As I am incapable of higher mathematics, I have devised "the rule of quarters." Each component of the course will determine 25% (more-or-less) of your grade for the course:

I. Electronic Journal (25%):

The writing you do in this class will take the form of an electronic journal in which you will write a weekly entry that includes both text and images pertaining to our field trips, readings, and class discussions. NO COMPUTING EXPERTISE IS ANTICIPATED—I WILL TEACH YOU ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW. You can check out some recent examples of these electronic journals here: http://www.wm.edu/niahd/journals. You will also log on at this site to begin and maintain your own journal. These journals are on-line, so anyone with access to the Internet (like parents and deans) can view them, so please use good taste. What you write is the key, and the greatest tool you have is the English language. It is the medium of William Shakespeare and Jane Austen; Rhys Isaac and Edmund Morgan. It is free to you for the taking. Don't abuse it.

I will assign you a very simple digital camera with which you will be able to record field trips in a visual way and from which you may upload images to your on-line journal. If you have your own digital camera, you are certainly free to use it instead. You may use any of the images you take as "art" for your journal, but you can also use absolutely any appropriate images you can find on the Internet. I'll give you plenty of help with that. While it is certainly true that what you write is more important than these digital images, the photos can provide very useful “talking points” for your prose. In any event, you MUST post at least three images per field trip They can come from the Internet., indeed from any source, as well as from the digital camera. There is provision for identifying the source of the images as you place them in your journal.

The electronic journal must be complete by 5:00 pm on the Monday following the end of class (Monday, 8 December). Length is unimportant. Quality is everything. I will expect to see evidence of (1) a grasp of the major points in the readings, (2) critical evaluation of the meaning of the museums or historic sites in relationship to the themes expressed in the readings, (3) an understanding of the class discussions. Although this "electronic term paper" will be a work in progress without formal grades until I evaluate it as a whole at the end of the semester, I will look at it weekly and give you feedback from time to time.

II. Oral Reports (25%):

Each of you will undertake two oral reports that stress the presentation of factual information linked in some way to the week's topic. The research should be easily accomplished from readily-available material on the Internet, in Swem Library or from the Colonial Williamsburg Research Library (where you will be welcome, by the way, and where you will have borrowing privileges if you fill out some paperwork). I'll be happy to guide you to additional places to look. My purpose is to have you become familiar with a few of the most basic sources of factual information about early American History and to provide in your reports some "take off points" for class discussions. You'll get the topic assignments approximately one week ahead of time. If you will email me an outline of the report by 5:00 pm on the Thursday prior to your time at center stage, I'll alert you if anything is amiss and suggest additional sources if you need them. These are to be SHORT reports--no more than 5 minutes--sometimes delivered before we depart, sometimes at lunch, sometimes in the middle of a site visit. Think of them this way: You are standing near the punch bowl at a party. Two or three people come up and demand that you explain your topic to them. In the space of consuming one glass of punch and two crackers loaded with Brie, what would you tell them?

Note: Over the last couple of years that students have come to rely on Wikipedia almost exclusively for these reports. I'm instituting a requirement that there be at least two sources, one of which must be print. You may simply identify the sources at the end of your report. Swem Library's homepage can help: http://www.wm.edu/academics/libraries/index.php

III: Classtime Discussions (25%):

As much of the discussion for any week will take place over lunch, we'll often do a lot of talking before we even see whatever it is we came to see after lunch, which in turn privileges the readings. Indeed, the only preparation I will expect is that you have a firm grasp of the readings. There will be also ample opportunity to talk as we poke around the places we visit and on the way home--anyplace we have an opening for an impromptu seminar session. Here again you are subject to my appallingly subjective evaluation of your participation in all class time activities.

IV: Final Exam (25%):

The exam will consist of short-answer questions that will require you to know the readings and be able to relate them to the sites we'll visit and the discussions we'll have. I’ll talk more with you about this component toward the end of the course.

Schedule

The schedule below is tentative, but probably about right.


29 August: The First New Nation

Theme: The American Revolution announced the entrance on the world stage of what historian Seymour Martin Lipset has called, "The First New Nation". But did independence automatically mean a complete break with the colonial past? The struggle against Great Britain had required service from all sorts of people, women among them, who served in essential noncombatant roles in every American campaign, including the Siege of Yorktown. What did they think of the Revolution? Surely, winning the war must have led to expectations of change. With independence from England a fact, the American people faced the daunting question of "what do we do now?" While political independence coincided with modest social change on some levels, it did little to touch the American time bomb, already ticking, of slavery.

Sites:

Yorktown Victory Center
Yorktown Battlefield
Yorktown

Readings:

Peter Kolchin, "Slavery and the American Revolution," chapter 3 from his book, American Slavery: 1618-1877 (1993), pp. 63-92.

Catherine Kerrison, "By the Book: Eliza Ambler Brent Carrington and Conduct Literature in Late Eighteenth-Century Virginia," Virginia Magazine of History & Biography, 105 (1997), pp. 27-52.

Holly Mayer, "Retainers to the Camp: The Conjugal Family," chapter 4 from her book, Belonging to the Army: Camp Followers and Community during the American Revolution (1996), pp.122-152.

Lunch: Carrot Tree Kitchen (Yorktown)


5 September: John Marshall's Richmond  

Theme: Before he was a chief justice of the supreme court, John Marshall was a primary force in the social and political world of the new state capital at Richmond where, after service during the Revolution, he built one of the first homes in the fashionable "Court End" neighborhood in 1790. Just down the street, lawyer John Wickham, a Loyalist in New York during the Revolution, built a town house in 1812 that rivaled any in northern cities. Marshall and Wickham were both involved in the 1807 treason trial of former vice-president Aaron Burr, Marshall as presiding judge; Wickham as Burr's lawyer. The trial was one of the premier events of the nation's early history, drawing crowds so large that eventually the proceedings had to be shifted to the legislative chamber in the new state capitol building designed by Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson was at that point President of the United States and the political enemy of both Burr and Marshall. Much to Jefferson's chagrin, Burr was found not guilty. Marshall and Wickham were later instrumental in the building of nearby Monumental Church between 1812 and 1814 as a monument to the 72 people who died in a theater fire in 1811.

Sites:

JohnMarshall House
John Wickham House
Monumental Church

Readings:

Gordon S. Wood, "The Real Treason of Aaron Burr," Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 143, No. 2 (Jun., 1999), pp. 280-295

Nancy Isenberg, "Will O' Wisp Treason," chapter 9 from her book, Fallen Founder: The Life of Aaron Burr (2007), pp. 319-365.

Sheila Phipps, "My Birthday-I Have Spent It Profitably," from her book, Genteel Rebel: The Life of Mary Greenhow Lee (2003), pp. 12-31.

Lunch: Café Richmond (Valentine Richmond History Center)


12 September: Well, Hello Dolley!

Theme: While James Madison was essential to the constitution; his presidency is mostly remembered for the burning of Washington during the War of 1812. Like his close political ally and neighbor, Thomas Jefferson, Madison was born into the top ranks of Virginia gentry society. Slightly younger than Jefferson (1743-1826), Madison (1751-1836), was a political "player" during the struggle for independence, but it was his contribution to state and especially national politics during the years after independence that earned him the titles of "Father of the Constitution" and "Author of the Bill of Rights." Madison was a far more successful planter at Montpelier than Jefferson was at Monticello, but like Jefferson, Madison was a slaveowner all his life. Also like Jefferson, Madison married a young widow. SInce Jefferson was a widow, Dorothea Payne Todd (1758-1849), a vivacious woman with an astute political mind became the first president's wife carry the title"First Lady." Also the first "First Lady" to be photographed, Dolly Madison was a political icon in the new nation until her death in 1849. While women did not vote and did not hold political office during the early years of the new republic, by Dolley Madison's time they had taken on a political role the "Founding Fathers" never envisioned.

Sites:

Montpelier

Readings:

Kenneth R. Bowling, " 'A Tub to the Whale': The Founding Fathers and Adoption of the Federal Bill of Rights," Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 8, No. 3 (1988), pp. 223-251.

Catherine Allgor, "Sex, Lies, and the Election of 1808," and "To Home and History," chapters 6 & 16 from her book, A Perfect Union: Dolley Madison and the Creation of the American Nation (2006), pp. 121-138; 339-372.

Lunch: Hickory Notch Grille (Maidens, VA)


19 September: Two Gentlemen from William & Mary 

Theme: William & Mary alumnus Thomas Jefferson mirrored the contradictions in American life after the Revolution. The quintessential advocate of liberty for white men, he owned slaves his entire life. His relationship with the African Americans who lived and worked at Monticello is a metaphor for race relations all over the antebellum South. The men, women, and children of "Mulberry Row" faced very real limitations of their ability to exert control over their world, but even within the confines of slavery, they were able to find small areas of autonomy. Jefferson's purchase of Louisiana in 1803 insured that on a national level slavery would become inextricably intertwined with expansion--and lead directly to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 during the presidency of Jefferson's neighbor and friend, James Monroe, also an alumnus of the College of William & Mary. Monroe's plantation home at Highland offers a contrast to Monticello in terms of scale and lifestyle. Monroe was heir to the political legacy of Jefferson's election to the presidency in 1800. Jefferson was the second precedent to reside in the new "federal city," Monroe the fourth. Especially in terms of style, political culture in Washington during the 1800-1825 Virginia presidential ascendancy that began with Jefferson and ended with Monroe was decidedly different from that both Jefferson and Monroe had experienced in the Old Dominion, and an important new element of that revised political scene was the indirect participation of women.

Sites:

Monticello
Highland (aka, "Ash Lawn")

Readings:

John Craig Hammond, " 'They Are Very Much Interested in Obtaining an Unlimited Slavery': Rethinking the Expansion of Slavery in the Louisiana Purchase Territories, 1803-1805," Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 23, No. 3 (2003), pp. 353-380.

Lucia Stanton, “ ‘Those Who Labor for My Happiness’: Thomas Jefferson and His Slaves,” in Peter S, Onuf., ed., Jeffersonian Legacies (1994), pp. 147-171..

Catherine Allgor, "Washington Women in Public," chapter 3 from her book, Parlor Politics, In Which the Ladies of Washington Help Build a City and a Government (2000), pp. 102-146.

Lunch: Michie Tavern (Charlottesville)


26 September: The Westward Movement

Theme:

The American frontier began at Jamestown and proceeded west from there. But exactly what was the "frontier"" That question has never been suitably defined. Was it a place? a process? How, exactly, was the western frontier different from the older settlements along the eastern seaboard? WAS it different from the east, or just a crude copy of eastern norms?. Most historians recognize on the frontier a mixture of people of widely differing cultures who borrowed in electic manner from each other. Certainly, that is the message of the Frontier Culture Museum, which concentrates especially on various farm houses--German, Irish, English, and two American houses, plus barns and other outbuilding--that have been brought from their original settings and reassembled for us in Staunton, Virginia. But some scholars see the material culture of the frontier as evidence that both confirms and yet undercuts some American assumptions about their frontier. Similarly, when assessing frontier society we must remember that it, like the society of the east, was deeply affected by the existence of slavery, and again, the question arises: how different was slavery on the frontier from slavery in the longer-settled region of the country?

Sites:

Frontier Culture Museum (Stanton, VA)

Readings:  

Elliott J. Gorn, ""Gouge and Bite, Pull Hair and Scratch": The Social Significance of Fighting in the Southern Backcountry," American Historical Review, Vol. 90, No. 1, Supplement to Volume 90. (1985), pp. 18-43.

Gail S. Terry, “Sustaining the Bonds of Kinship in a Trans-Appalachian Migration, 1790-1811: The Cabell-Breckinridge Slaves Move West,” Virginia Magazine of History & Biography, 102 (1994), pp. 455-476.

Ann Smart Martin, "Living in the Backcountry: Styles and Standards," chapter 4 , from her book, Buying into the World of Goods: Early Consumers in Backcountry Virginia (2008). pp. 94-144.

Lunch: Christian's Pizza (Charlottesville)


3 October: NO CLASS
10 October: Honor and Slavery 

Theme:

Black and white, slave and free, male and female; all southerners placed enormous, sometimes fatal, emphasis on how they were perceived by others--that is to say, on "Honor." This focus on the maintenance of appearance and dignity promoted dueling between men of all classes. Southern males sometimes shot each other over ill-chosen words--or in contests over the affections of a young lady. How does this help us to understand southern politics and the coming of the Civil War? Meanwhile, slavery changed its nature over the course of the antebellum period as masters became more and more concerned with potential slave unrest. That uneasiness even played into the design of slave housing, as masters used private space to reward good behavior and yet arranged that space to promote surveillance of their slaves. Yet even within this ever-tightening system of surveillance and paranoia, slaves managed to carve out small spaces of autonomonjy--even maintaining purchasing power that has allowed Ann Smart Martin to track their tastes in consumer items. Virginia's departure from the Union in April of 1861 was the culmination of a long process during which many Virginias hoped desperately for a way to avoid secession. As the crisis approached, purely logical factors often gave way to emotional considerations, and southern notions of "honor" came forcefully into play, especially among young elite males such as the young men educated at places like the College of William & Mary.

Sites:

Wren Building
Bacon's Castle Mansion & Slave House
Chippokes Plantation
Isle of Wight Courthouse of 1800
Boydkin Tavern

Readings:

Kenneth S. Greenberg, "The Nose, the Lie, and the Duel in the Antebellum South," The American Historical Review, Vol. 95, No. 1 (1990), pp. 57-74.

Robert F. Pace, "Honor and Violence," chapter 4 from his book, Halls of Honor: College Men in the Old South (2004), pp. 82-97.

Larry McKee, "The Ideals and Realities Behind the Design and Use of 19th Century Virginia Slave Cabins," in Anne Elizabeth Yentsch & Mary C. Beaudry, ed., The Art and Mystery of Historical Archaeology, Essays in Honor of James Deetz (1992), pp. 195-213.

Ann Smart Martin, "Suckey's Looking Glass: African Americans as Consumers," chapter 6 from her book, Buying into the World of Goods: Early Consumers in Backcountry Virginia (2008). pp. 173-193.

Lunch: Surry House (Surry, VA)


17 October: Stone Walls and Iron Ships

Theme:

Abraham Lincoln's 1863 Emancipation Proclamation is, of course, the document Americans most associate with freedom for the slaves, but it was actually General Benjamin Butler' 1861 legal theory of "contraband of war," announced when Butler was the Union commandeer at Fortress Monroe, that first began to wear away the chains of slavery. It was in the wake of Butler's decision not to return escaped slaves to their confederate masters than prompted thousands of African-Americans to escape to Union lines, thereby seizing freedom for themselves and their families. Perhaps "Freedom's Fortress" is as goo a place as any to ponder the wustion of why southerners took the remarkable gamble of leaving the Union. Fort Monroe remained in Union hand throughout the war, and in early 1862 it became the jump-off point for a Union drive on Richmond. Union plans were interrupted, however, when the Confederate ironclad, C.S.S. Virginia, appeared the the James River. On March 9, 1862, the Union ironclad, U.S.S. Monitor, squared off against the Virginia (perhaps better known by its former name, the "Merrimac") in the "Battle of Hampton Roads." Naval warfare changed forever that day, as wood and sail gave way to iron and steam. Neither the Monitor nor the Virginia did serious damage to their opponent and they never fought again. And neither ship survived into 1863. But just as surely as their battle changed the nature of war at sea, the existence of the Virginia and the appearance of the Monitor in Hampton Roads altered the course of the Civil War. By the end of the war, both sides--but especially the Union--would build fleets of ironclads. 

Sites:

Fortress Monroe
USS Monitor Center (Mariners Museum)

Reading:

Edward L. Ayers, "What Caused the Civil War," chapter 7 from his book, What Caused the Civil War?: Reflections on the South and Southern History (2005), pp. 131-144.

Joseph T. Glatthaar, "Why They Enlisted," chapter 4 from his book, General Lee's Army: From Victory to Collapse (2008), pp. 29-41.

James M. McPherson, "Who Freed the Slaves?," Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 139, No. 1 (Mar., 1995), pp. 1-10.  

Michael J. Bennett, " 'My Youthful Emagination of Hell': The Face of Battle for Union Sailors," chapter 8 from his book, Union Jacks: Yankee Sailors in the Civil War (2004), pp. 182-208.

Lunch: Mariners Museum Cafe


24 October: Lee Takes Command: The Seven Days Battles 

Theme: After the Battle of Williamsburg, the Confederate army retreated to the very outskirts of Richmond, then attacked McClellan at the indecisive Battle of Seven Pines on May 31, 1862. When Joseph Johnston was severely wounded, Robert E. Lee became commander of the "Army of Northern Virginia." The ever-aggressive Lee soon took the offensive against McClellan in a series of battles we call "The Seven Days." It is at least plausible either side might have won the Civil War during the Seven Days. Instead, poor intelligence, the inability to coordinate the armies, and "the fog of war" on both sides produced savage fighting, but no decisive outcome. The two armies would pound each other for the rest of the conflict, but the essential toughness of each was forged at battles like Gaines's Mill and Malvern Hill. In the long run, perhaps the key outcome of the Seven Days Battles was a decided move by the Lincoln administration toward a "harder" war that made the destruction of slavery, rather than just the preservation of the union, a Northern war aim. Shortly after the conclusion of the Seven Days Battles, Abraham Lincoln removed the bulk of Union forces from the Virginia Peninsula and directed George McClelland to place them under the command of General John Pope, whom Lee soon bested at the Battle of Second Bull Run. The Seven Days battles were no masterpieces of the military art, but the Union had been turned back from the gates of Richmond, Lee had emerged as the great hero of the South, and the Army of Northern Virginia he had stitched together was set for a long run of victories interrupted only by the unsuccessful Antietam campaign and that ultimately ended with the final repulse of "Pickett's Charge" at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania on 3 July, 1863..

Sites:

Gaines Mill Battlefield
Malvern Hill Battlefield
Berkeley Plantation (Harrison's Landing)

Readings:   

William A. Blair, "The Seven Days and the Radical Persuasion: Convincing Radicals in the North of the Need for a Hard War," in Gary W. Gallagher, ed., The Richmond Campaign of 1862: The Peninsula & The Seven Days (2000), pp. 153-180.

Lesley J. Gordon, "Virginia, 1862: Shaking with the Thunders of Battle," chapter 7 from her book, General George E. Pickett in Life & Legend(1998), pp. 84-95.

Joseph T. Glatthaar, "The Battle for Richmond: The Seven Days' Campaign," and "Combat," chapters 12 & 25 from his book, General Lee's Army: From Victory to Collapse (2008), pp. 135-149; 315-333.

Lunch:  Picnic at Berkeley Plantation


26 October: Optional Barbecue at Rosewell

Theme: A favorite haunt of Thomas Jefferson, Rosewell was probably the most impressive private home in British North America—three full stories with magnificent details. The Page family seat, it was begun about 1725 and survived until 1916, when it burned. The ruins are spectacular in their own right—worthy of Edgar Allen Poe. Each fall the Rosewell Foundation sponsors a barbecue at the ruins. It is on a Sunday, includes some fabulous food, great live music, and a silent auction. If you’d like to come with me, I'll cover the cost.

Sites:

Ruins of Rosewell Plantation, Gloucester County, VA

Reading:

NONE  

Lunch: Barbecue at Rosewell


31 October: Invasion!: The Battles of Antietam and Gettysburg 

Theme: The stage set by his resounding victory over Union General John Pope at Second Bull Run, Robert E. Lee invaded North in 1862, crossing the Potomac River into western Maryland with a multifaceted agenda: influence politics in the North, "liberate" Maryland, and convince European powers to mediate a peace. The result was the bloodiest single day of fighting in American history at Antietam Creek, Maryland. In a truly pivotal battle, George McClellan, recently returned to command of Union forces in the East, blunted Lee's invasion attempt but failed to crush or even vigorously pursue the southern army as it retreated into Virginia. For this Lincoln removed McClellan from command. In the wake of the Battle of Antietam, Lincoln issued his Emancipation Proclamation, once again altering the trajectory of the war. After decisively defeating Union forces again at Fredericksburg and at Chancellorsville, Lee once more invaded the North in 1863. Almost a year to the day after the conclusion of the Seven Days Battles, the Army of the Potomac under George Meade defeated Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The men on both sides fought valiantly, but generalship for the Confederates--usually a strength--was poor throughout. By contrast, leadership in the northern army was--for the first time since the war began--excellent, overall. In popular works of both history and fiction, the south's effort is often presented as both desperate and doomed from the outset. In fact, the Confederates came within a hair's breath of winning on both days one and two, and George Pickett's famous charge on the third day might very well have succeeded.

NOTE: The details for this trip are not yet firmed up. You will have an opportunity to offer input, but for certain, this will be an entirely OPTIONAL trip. It will certainly require at leaqst one night on the road and possibly two.

Sites:

Antietam Battlefield, (Sharpsburg, MD)
Gettysburg Battlefield (Gettysburg, PA)

Readings:

James M. McPherson, "The Beginning of the End," chapter 5 of his book, Antietam: The Battle That Changed the Course of the Civil War (2002), pp. 133-156.

Joseph T. Glatthaar, "Taking the War to the Enemy," and "The Failure at Gettysburg" chapters 13 & 22 from his book, General Lee's Army: From Victory to Collapse (2008), pp. 150-173; 268-288.

Lesley J. Gordon, "Pennsylvania, 1863: With All This Much to Lose," chapter 9 from her book, General George E. Pickett in Life & Legend(1998), pp. 106-120.  

Lunch: Dobbin House Tavern (Gettysburg, PA)


7 November: Civilians and the Civil War

Theme: Union or Confederate, the homefront during the Civil War was as different from previous war-time experiences as was the actual fighting. In 1859, Richard Decauter Lee (no relation to R. E. Lee) built a fine mansion just south of Williamsburg. After only three years of residence, the Civil War evicted Lee, his wife, and daughters when the Confederate generals John B. Magruder and (later) Joseph E. Johnson commandeered the house as army headquarters. The Lees did not return to Lee Hall until 1871. Whenever the armies clashed, thousands of civilians became refugees and soldiers on both sides destroyed and pilfered enormous amounts of private property. The armies also impressed goods and, on the Peninsula, slaves. Using slave labor, Confederates constructed two lines of massive earthworks, the "Warwick River Line" and "The Williamsburg Line," the latter originally designed by Colonel Benjamin Stoddert Ewell, formerly President of the College of William & Mary, whose students and faculty had all entered Confederate service. After the 1862 Battle of Williamsburg, the Williamsburg-Yorktown area became a frontier or sorts, for although the towns remained under Union occupation throughout the remainder of the war, Confederate forces contested the northern reaches of James City County into 1864--so that when Lincoln issued the 1863 Emancipation Proclamation, he applied it to James City County but excluded York County, which was more firmly under Union control. We'll visit Lee Hall and Yorktown--extant examples of earthworks at Yorktown, Gloucester Point, along the Colonial Parkway, and at Williamsburg.

Sites:

Lee Hall Mansion
Civil War Yorktown & Gloucester Point
Battle of Williamsburg

Readings:

Drew Gilpin Faust, "Altars of Sacrifice: Confederate Women and the Narratives of War," Journal of American History, 76 (1990), pp. 1200-1228.

Scott Reynolds Nelson & Carol Sheriff," 'Cair, Anxiety, & Tryals': Life in the Wartime Union," and " 'War's Miseries': The Confederate Home Front," chapters 11 & 12 from their book, A People at War: Civilians and Soldiers in America's Civil War (2007), pp. 231-256; 260-285.

Lunch: Rivah Cafe (Yorktown)


14 November: The Lives of Civil War Soldiers

Theme: Who were the soldiers on both sides during the Civil War and what were their peacetime backgrounds and wartime stories? Contrary to popular stereotypes, most Union soldiers were from rural backgrounds, while not a few Confederates were from towns like Richmond. With the exception of immigrants from Ireland, the great waves of immigration from Europe that marked the post-Civil War years had not begun. Both sides claimed to be the legitimate heirs of the struggle for independence during the American Revolution and of the enshrinement of liberty during the years of the New Republic. If the soldiers were so similar, why then did they kill each other by the thousands? We'll address these questions at Pamplin Park, a museum on the site of the Union breakthrough against Lee's entrenchment's at Petersburg on April 2, 1865. The Confederates immediately evacuated nearby Richmond and on April 9, Lee surrendered to Union General Ulysses S. Grant. Pamplin Park gives s the opportunity to explore the nature of soldier life on both sides during the Civil War, from the ferocity of combat to the boredom of camp existence between battles.

Sites:

Pamplin Park Military Museum (Petersburg)

Readings:

Joseph T. Glatthaar, "Desertion," chapter 32 from his book, General Lee's Army: From Victory to Collapse (2008), pp. 408-420...

James M. McPherson, "If I Flinched I Was Ruined," chapter 4 from his book, For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War (1997), pp. 46-61.

Scott Reynolds Nelson & Carol Sheriff, "The Male World of the Camp," chapter 10 from their book, A People at War: Civilians and Soldiers in America's Civil War (2007), pp. 214-228.

Lesley J. Gordon, "Virginia, 1864-1865: Is That Man Still with This Army?," chapter 11 from her book, General George E. Pickett in Life & Legend (1998), pp. 135-155.

Lunch: Hardtack & Coffee Cafe (Pamplin Park)


21 November: Confederate Capital 

Theme: By the 1840s, Richmond had developed into an urban area with a significant industrial and commercial base, lavish displays of "high style," and deep involvement in national politics. Impressive public buildings speak to Richmond's aspirations to be a major city in the mold of New York or Philadelphia. Along the James, Tredegar Iron Works was merely the best known of many industrial enterprises made possible by the Kanawa Canal. But the Civil War changed all that, as Richmond became the second--and las--capital of the Confederacy. To house President Jefferson Davis the Confederate government acquired a mansion that, although gray in color, became known as "The White House of the Confederacy." That mansion and several other contemporary buildings such as St. Paul's Episcopal Church, and St. Peter's Catholic Church survive in the Capitol Square neighborhood. Richmond became the governmental hub of the Confederacy, and long before the end of the war in 1865, it was a place where the stress of war took its toll on the civilian population. With the business district in flames when the Confederate forces withdrew from the city in 1865, many Richmonders took refuge on the grounds of the state Capitol and still in use today. Among the refugees were the wife and daughters of Robert E. Lee, who resided in a small brick house not far away. Jefferson Davis and his family had already fled the town by railroad. A short time later, Davis and his wife, Varina Howell Davis, were captured in Georgia.

Sites:

Tredegar Iron Works
Capitol Square Neighborhood
Church Hill Neighborhood

Readings:

Elizabeth R. Varon, “Tippecanoe and the Ladies, Too: White Women and Party Politics in Antebellum Virginia,” Journal of American History, Vol. 82, No. 2 (1995), pp. 494-521.

Gregg D. Kimball, "Strangers, Slaves, and Southern Iron," chapter 5 from his book, American City, Southern Place: A Cultural History of Antebellum Richmond (2000), pp. 159-182.

Nelson Lankford, "Upon the Wings of Lightning," chapter 13 of his book, Richmond Burning: The Last Days of the Confederate Capital (2002), pp. 156-167.

Joan E. Cashin, "Run with the Rest," chapter 7 from her book, First Lady of the Confederacy: Varina Davis's Civil War (2006), pp. 152-170.

Lunch: Bottoms Up Pizza (Richmond)


5 December: Memory and the Civil War

Theme:

Memory is a tricky thing. It is abundantly clear that Richmond has never gotten over the Civil War. Less than two days after the town fell to Union troops in 1865, Abraham Lincoln and his son Tad walked from Rocket's Landing at the base of Church Hill up Main Street into downtown Richmond surrounded by throngs of liberated African Americans. Regrettably, no northern photographers had reached the city, so there are no photographs. When the National Park Service placed a bronze statue of Lincoln and Tad on the grounds of NPS Richmond headquarters at Tredegar Iron Works in 2003, protesters were kept at the gates to the place, but regaled the people in attendance with versions of the rebel yell. Jefferson Davis was born midway between the founding of Jamestown. This years marks the two-hundredth anniversay of his birth. In July, the American Civil War Center, a private museum on the grounds of Tredegar Iron Works whose director is an African-American woman, agreed to accept a costly bronze statue of Jefferson Davis from the Sons of Confederate Veterans, but also warned that the statue might simply go into storage. How should Americans in the 21st century remember the Civil War? We'll take a look at a few places in Richmond that will cover some aspects of the attempt there to preserve--and to manipulate--the memory of the Civil War, a process that began almost as soon at the war ended and continuing to the present day.

Sites:

Museum of the Confederacy
Whitehouse of the Confederacy
Monument Avenue
Hollywood Cemetery

Readings:

Tony Horwitz, "Confederates in the Attic," chapter 1 from his book, Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War (1998), pp. 3-17.

Nelson Lankford, "Epilogue: Blunt and Withered Laurels," Epilogue from his book, Richmond Burning: The Last Days of the Confederate Capital (2002), pp. 241-248.

William A. Blair, "Waging Politics through Decoration Days," chapter 3 from his book, Cities of the Dead: Contesting the Memory of the Civil War in the South (2004), pp. 49-76.

John M. Coski, "Vindication of the Cause," chapter 9 from his book, The Confederate Battle Flag (2005), pp. 184-202.

Lunch:  Bill's Barbecue (Richmond)